Home
Computer information you can not only use, but understand!

Search

Suckerfish Menus

  • Links & Resources
  • Email Us
  • Get Help Now!
    • Custom Help
  • Tips Archive
    • All of our Video Tips
    • Application Tips
    • Digital Photography
    • Email Tips
    • General Computer Tips
    • Hardware tips
    • Internet Tips
    • Mac Tips
    • Ubuntu Tips
    • Windows Tips
  • Users Groups
    • Digital Photography
    • GJ Computer Users Group
  • Podcasts
  • About the Show
    • Newsletter Archives
    • Podcasts
    • Tedd's Bargains
Home

Our RSS Feeds

Subscribe to our RSS feed
OR, get a daily email update by clicking here:

Poll

Email Newsletter

Email

Powered by Zinester our weekly newsletter is 100% SPAM FREE!

Donate to the Site

Why I don't like the bleeding edge

Submitted by Adam on October 11, 2006 - 9:59pm.
  • Riding Shotgun with Adam

Cutting edge technology is great. I love to see the newest trends in technology.

Cutting edge is one thing, bleeding edge is a totally different story. Bleeding edge is a term used for techno test pilots, those who adopt a new technology before it is ever around long enough to be considered a new trend or standard.

For example, cutting edge people are just now adopting HD TVs, hybrid cars and websites like YouTube. Bleeding edge people are buying BluRay DVD players, computers with two dual core processors and buy their groceries on the Internet.

Some technology that I consider bleeding edge has been around for a long time.

I have had a client's computer at my house for almost three weeks. Typically I can get a computer completely overhauled in about three days working on it in the evenings after I get home.

However, this particular computer has two SATA hard drives setup in a RAID. Don't worry about what that means, it's not important.

The problem is that Windows is corrupt on it and you can't read the data from either drive. The FAT on each drive has also become corrupt. This means that even if you put the drives into a computer that can read SATA drives - you can't read the drives.

Since the drives were setup in a RAID, the corruption spread from one drive to another - again, what this means is not important. The end result is that the computer is all messed up.

This computer is an almost new DELL. SATA drives are a new type of hard drive that supposedly runs faster but is not natively recognized by Windows. RAID is essentially two hard drives that work as a single hard drive by making exact duplicates of the information on either drive.

RAID and SATA are used together in very fast video gaming machines, but there is little or no reason to setup a system like this in a home computer. But, Dell is happy to sell you such a configuration if you call and order the best and/or most expensive home computer they have to offer.

The problem with this type of system is that DELL and others who sell machines like this assume that if you order such a system, you must know enough about how to fix it. Don't even expect the support people in India to be able to help you through an issue like this.

Since the heart of the problem is software related, it is not covered under Dell's warranty. This means that they have to pay a computer guy like me to work on the system.

The reason I have had the system for three weeks is because I have had to order one special cable and wait for two special disks in order to fix the problem.

Now all parts are in place but I am still not sure the fix will work. Not because I don't know how to fix it, but because I don't know if the computer or drives will cooperate.

I am very anxious to get this problem fixed.

A word of advice: It's never a bad idea to spend a little more on a computer for a little better performance, but don't go overboard. Once you cross over into technology that is not standard for the way you use the system, you are getting into dangerous geek-infested waters.

If you liked this post, consider buying me a beer!
  • ‹ previous
  • 943 of 1416
  • next ›
  • Printer-friendly version
  • Stumble

SATA or ESATA

Submitted by Smart Computer User on November 14, 2008 - 9:20pm.

SATA is internal, while ESATA is external. I bought an external (ESATA) drive about 45 days ago, the purpose was to store video files converted from DVD's to go onto an IPOD. The darn thing failed and I am waiting for a replacement drive (5 year warranty).

The SATA has higher transfer rates than the older hard drives, and are now much more common than when Adam wrote the article in 2006.

Walter
Phoenix, AZ

  • reply
  • Printer-friendly version

SATA or ESATA

Submitted by Smart Computer User on November 14, 2008 - 9:20am.

What is the difference between SATA and ESATA?

  • reply
  • Printer-friendly version

Post new comment

  • You may use [inline:xx] tags to display uploaded files or images inline.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.

Recent comments

  • Yorkie
    27 min 49 sec ago
  • Wonderful
    31 min 50 sec ago
  • Good points
    33 min 8 sec ago
  • the argument against
    58 min 34 sec ago
  • An Advice
    2 hours 56 min ago
  • Love this tutorial
    9 hours 48 min ago
  • Menchu
    18 hours 3 min ago
  • dog scam happened to me
    21 hours 20 min ago
  • Thank You!
    1 day 8 min ago
  • “All About Jazz” Registers Highest Ever Alexa Rankings!
    1 day 2 hours ago

Add to My Yahoo!

Google Reader or Homepage



Add to My AOL

Navigation

  • Audio
  • directory
  • Tedd's Bargains
  • Video Answers
  • recent posts
  • news aggregator

We reviewed

cover of Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition Upgrade with Service Pack 2
Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition Upgrade with Service Pack 2Read the review
Copyright © 1996-2008 Rick Castellini, Adam Cochran and Grand Valley PC Partners, LLC
RoopleTheme