Home
Computer information you can not only use, but understand!

Search

Suckerfish Menus

  • Links & Resources
  • Email Us
  • Get Help Now!
    • Custom Help
  • Tips Archive
    • All of our Video Tips
    • Application Tips
    • Digital Photography
    • Email Tips
    • General Computer Tips
    • Hardware tips
    • Internet Tips
    • Mac Tips
    • Ubuntu Tips
    • Windows Tips
  • Users Groups
    • Digital Photography
    • GJ Computer Users Group
  • Podcasts
  • About the Show
    • Newsletter Archives
    • Podcasts
    • Tedd's Bargains
Home

Our RSS Feeds

Subscribe to our RSS feed
OR, get a daily email update by clicking here:

Poll

Email Newsletter

Email

Powered by Zinester our weekly newsletter is 100% SPAM FREE!

Donate to the Site

Riding Shotgun

  • AVG stumbles again
  • Rick answers his email - Videocast 010
  • Google News Alerts
  • My pick for the best technology currently available
more

Help make April 15th just another day

Submitted by Rick on April 15, 2008 - 10:23pm.
  • Riding Shotgun with Rick

I was excited this election season to see Mike Huckabee and Ron Paul make a small splash about the Fair Tax bill sitting in Congress. If you take the time to learn about the bill, it is hard not to see it's advantages over our current, broken, and unfair system of taxation.

Yes, I know that this is a technology site. But having a more fair tax system would allow all of us to invest in more tech stuff and companies would have the freedom to develop even better technologies than we already have today! 

Please visit the Americans for Fair Tax web site and take the time to study and learn about this proposal and then write your congressman or woman and senators to encourage their support of this important proposal. Better yet, buy the Fair Tax Book , read it and pass it on to friends and family. You will be amazed at how simple and fair the plan really is.

  • ‹ previous
  • 113 of 1357
  • next ›
  • Printer-friendly version
  • Stumble

...

Submitted by Smart Computer User on April 21, 2008 - 4:35pm.

The only fair tax is no tax.

  • reply
  • Printer-friendly version

I HAVE read the UnFair Tax Book

Submitted by Smart Computer User on April 21, 2008 - 11:49am.

Not only have I read the book, but I've discussed these questions with the person who runs the website pushing the Unfair Tax. The national sales tax is NOT fair. It is a bad idea. It will make government MORE powerful. You need to think about all the ways government will manipulate the national sales tax. And you need to realize there are many, many savers, primarily Roth IRA holders, who will get taxed twice by the new system.

Read your posts, guys. You are attacking me instead of my points. I'd bet dollars to donuts you haven't researched this anywhere close to as much as I have.

  • reply
  • Printer-friendly version
Rick's picture

Not a tax site

Submitted by Rick on April 21, 2008 - 8:05pm.

Yes, I have read and talked about this proposal with ex-IRS officials, accountants, tax preparers and read the pros and cons from as many sources as I can find. The facts are this:

1. Only people reporting income pay income taxes in the U.S. currently
2. Non-citizens who utilize our schools, hospitals, roads, and other infrastructure DO NOT contribute to the costs of these services.
3. I wish I could find the article I read about 10 years ago or so, but a study was done (I think it was the Dallas newspaper) where 10 different tax preparers and accountants were given a family of four's tax information for that calendar year. The result was 10 completely different bottom lines because of the interpretation of the bloated and unfair current tax code. If not even 2 of 10 tax preparers can agree on how to fill out an IRS form, how can the average Joe expect too?
4. In our current system, double and triple taxation occurs all the time....capital gains taxes, death taxes, etc.
5. The Fair Tax levels the playing field. No more forms, no more off-shore accounts, no more dodging and weaving by anyone. If you buy something, you pay a tax that is as plain as the nose on my face (and it's a pretty big nose). Your tax is the same as my tax. Those who consume more, pay more. Those who save and consume less, pay less. And for the less fortunate in our society, a provision is built-in that refunds the cost of the tax on food and other necessities.
6. Speaking of refunds, what a sham and a shame that every year from January to May we hear about the "use your refund for this or that." The refund keeps uninformed Americans thinking that they are getting back a bonus at the end of the year. Yikes! And society perpetuates this myth by making it such a festival. Makes me sick.

Read the book again, my friend. And keep your mind open while doing so. Also, read the follow-up book that addresses all the misconceptions about the bill.

  • reply
  • Printer-friendly version

You made it a Tax Site

Submitted by Smart Computer User on April 25, 2008 - 9:12pm.

Rick, Your tax system objectives: 1: Simple, 2: Fair. There is nothing inherent in the Income Tax system that can't be made simple and fair. Every dollar spent was once a dollar of income.

Conversely, there is nothing in the Fair Tax system that prevents Congress from evolving it to complicated and unfair. Fact is, a vast majority of voters thinks the current system is fair and simple enough. Every attempted simplification fails. Reason? Congress uses taxes to raise funds, but also for "social engineering", and to control the economy. Congress will never give this up.

The so-called Fair Tax system will lead to a *more* complicated tax system, as it gives Congress one more way to extract money from citizens. Ultimately, I predict the "fair tax" will evolve to a Europe-like Value Added Tax.

You will not prevent a return of income taxes until you amend the U.S. Constitution. That takes 3/4 of states to ratify the amendment. Yes, it's *possible* but extremely unlikely. To pass a "fair tax" before ratification would be foolish.

If you want another Boston Tea Party, I suggest you amend the Constitution to limit all government spending to some maximum percentage of the gross national product. No exceptions, not even war.

  • reply
  • Printer-friendly version
Rick's picture

We are finding common ground...

Submitted by Rick on April 25, 2008 - 10:39pm.

I totally agree that spending has to be limited. We cannot and should not become one giant assisted living center.

As for the majority of people thinking our current system is fair and simple enough...I saw "ha ha". The majority of people are clueless on how to read their own paycheck! They are clueless that the refund they get every spring is through their own ignorance and is NOT a government gift, but their very own money they worked hard for through the year. And many are not smart enough to even read a tax form or instruction manual let alone make a judgment on its simplicity or fairness. If you think otherwise, then you are a much bigger optimist than I.

Yes, the government does use the tax system to control votes and the population...my very reason for supporting the Fair Tax. That's where my optimism kicks in...I think that Americans are smart enough to see that when they can bring home every penny they earn, they will be much more vigilant about how they separate with those monies. Now, those monies disappear before they even see them and it is truly a case of out-of-site-out-of-mind.

We are much closer in our philosophies than you realize, my friend.

  • reply
  • Printer-friendly version

Yes, the objective is the same

Submitted by Smart Computer User on April 26, 2008 - 1:55pm.

If you think people are not smart enough to read a tax instruction booklet, you shouldn't think they are smart enough to see the subtle impact of sales taxes on their well being. For example, very few people can say what part of the cost of gasoline is taxes. When they complain about high gas prices, they point to oil companies, not taxes.

Have you ever been to Europe? I assume not, otherwise you would not be so enthusiastic about letting the feds have a sales tax. The current proposal has absolutely no checks on future modifications of the "fair tax" to make it absolutely oppressive. That would take a Constitutional amendment.

Congress *will* buy votes by using sales tax exemptions, rebates, higher rates for things "rich" people buy, and lower rates for things "poor" people buy. Once you have rebates, exemptions and variable rates, you need enforcement so the "wrong" people don't use them. Enforcement will lead to tax forms, instruction booklets, and tax advisors - just like we have now. And, of course, the income tax will be back - initially to get at the really rich people. Then it will slowly trickle down to the rest of us, courtesy of inflation.

I suspect we have the same philosophy toward government spending. That's why I'm still commenting. When I first heard about the fair tax, I was enthusiastic. Thinking about the unchecked evolution of it changed my mind. Basically, you are not going to stop Congress from social engineering by trying to change collection methods.

Want to shock people with the taxes they pay? Instead of changing the whole tax system, simply get rid of payroll deductions and make them write a check every month, or better yet, pay in cash. Imagine the wide open eyes!!

  • reply
  • Printer-friendly version

The Very Fair Tax

Submitted by Smart Computer User on April 20, 2008 - 8:10pm.

The anti-Fair Tax writer clearly has not read the Fair Tax book, nor has any real facts. He and all of us would benefit greatly from this change in our system.It would put our earned money back into our own pockets to spend or not as we choose. That takes power away from those who run the show now. Of course they don't want the Fair Tax. They want to keep us dependent on the government for everything. The Fair Tax would make us more free to live our lives as we choose. That's why Washington is afraid of it and many of the general population have never heard of it.

  • reply
  • Printer-friendly version

Un-fair Tax

Submitted by Smart Computer User on April 19, 2008 - 8:38pm.

The so-called Fair Tax (National Sales Tax) will cause all savers' to be taxed twice, once when they earned it and once again when they spend it. Only non-savers should be in favor of this tax system.

In addition, you will find that proponents will not be getting rid of the Income Tax Constitutional Amendment before they pass the National Sales Tax. If the National Sales Tax is passed, we will have both an income tax and a sales tax. Won't that be fun?

Finally, anyone who thinks Congress won't be fiddling with the National Sales Tax rates to tax the "rich" more heavily is dreaming. This idea sounds good until you start thinking about the details. It's just not a good plan.

  • reply
  • Printer-friendly version
Rick's picture

Get your tax facts correct

Submitted by Rick on April 19, 2008 - 10:53pm.

Wow, it's uninformed comments like this one that keep us mired in "politics as usual" in our country. The facts are that the income tax repeal is built-in to the law. One can't happen with the other. Don't let fear mongerers like this keep you from reading about and studying this monumentally country and life changing legislation.

Guys like this might be working for a political party because without an income tax to play class war fare with and hold people hostage with, the power goes back to the people. With the current, broken system, all the power resides in D.C.

  • reply
  • Printer-friendly version

Geez Rick - You really are naive

Submitted by Smart Computer User on April 21, 2008 - 11:34am.

The "facts" are that the income tax is allowed by the 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. You cannot "repeal" the income tax with just the passage of a law. 75% of state legislatures must ratify any change to the Constitution. The chances of that happening are slim and none.

You are hoping that a law can be passed to stop implementing the income tax at the same time a national sales tax is passed. Even if this happened, it is the height of naivete to believe that future Congresses won't re-implement income taxes. Then we'll have both a national sales tax and an income tax. Real nice.

Further, when you say "one can't happen without the other" you don't know that do you? Because a bill has not yet been passed by either house of Congress. It could easily happen that income taxes become a part of whatever bill eventually might pass. You MUST repeal the 16th Amendment before passing a national sales tax, or I guarantee we will end up with more money in the hands of Washington.

If you want power back to the people, as you seem to, you will work for a Constitutional cap to the amount of money all government can spend - like maybe 15% of gross domestic product. All you are doing is changing how they take our money. The national sales tax you favor will ultimately allow them to take much more.

  • reply
  • Printer-friendly version
Rick's picture

I agree

Submitted by Rick on April 21, 2008 - 8:12pm.

Limiting government spending is huge. But regarding the repeal of the 16th amendment, yes it can happen and will happen if American citizens know the truth about current, broken, and highly lopsided system and how raising revenues that treat everyone the same regardless of income, citizenship, or pedigree can be instituted instead.

Think Boston Tea Party. We need another one.

  • reply
  • Printer-friendly version

same here

Submitted by Smart Computer User on April 18, 2008 - 7:27pm.

I want it too. sadly, most people mistake it for the flat tax (blantently it isn't), & they think it's going to cost them more than the current tax "plan". Check out Neal Boortz's website & book on the subject.

  • reply
  • Printer-friendly version

fairtax

Submitted by Smart Computer User on April 17, 2008 - 9:10pm.

I wont the fairtax NOW!!!! and cut spending

  • reply
  • Printer-friendly version

Post new comment

  • You may use [inline:xx] tags to display uploaded files or images inline.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Polls

Recent comments

  • There is an entry at the AVG
    6 hours 7 min ago
  • sp3
    8 hours 9 min ago
  • My favorite new features
    11 hours 2 min ago
  • AVG Response
    15 hours 40 min ago
  • AVG
    16 hours 46 min ago
  • AVG
    16 hours 47 min ago
  • Old IE could do this...
    17 hours 40 min ago
  • I received similar e-mails for a Chow-Keeshond mix
    18 hours 38 min ago
  • Inkjet Printers
    19 hours 44 min ago
  • Olympic Volleyball
    20 hours 37 sec ago

Add to My Yahoo!

Google Reader or Homepage



Add to My AOL

Navigation

  • Audio
  • Chatblock help
  • directory
  • Tedd's Bargains
  • Video Answers
  • recent posts
  • news aggregator

We reviewed

cover of Sandisk SDMX4-4096 Sansa e260 4 GB MP3 Player with SD Expansion Slot
Sandisk SDMX4-4096 Sansa e260 4 GB MP3 Player with SD Expansion SlotRead the review

Popular content

Today's:

  • Solution for computer that can't change desktop wallpaper / background
  • AVG Free Antivirus 8.0 Upgrade - Video Tip
  • Fun with Cameroon Pet Scams

All time:

  • Solution for computer that can't change desktop wallpaper / background
  • Error 404
  • Sansa e200 Series - Making iPod Nano lovers jealous
  • AVG Free Antivirus 8.0 Upgrade - Video Tip
  • Links & Resources
  • Test your fax machine without bothering friends
  • AVG AntiVirus Upgrade
  • Norton may slow computers down
  • Fun with Cameroon Pet Scams
  • HP Director won't open
Copyright © 1996-2008 Rick Castellini, Adam Cochran and Grand Valley PC Partners, LLC
RoopleTheme